Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
J Med Virol ; 93(9): 5603-5607, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1363670

ABSTRACT

It has been estimated that individuals with COVID-19 can shed replication-competent virus up to a maximum of 20 days after initiation of symptoms. The majority of studies that addressed this situation involved hospitalized individuals and those with severe disease. Studies to address the possible presence of SARS-CoV-2 during the different phases of COVID-19 disease in mildly infected individuals, and utilization of viral culture techniques to identify replication-competent viruses, have been limited. This report describes two patients with mild forms of the disease who shed replication-competent virus for 24 and 37 days, respectively, after symptom onset.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , SARS-CoV-2/growth & development , Virus Cultivation , Animals , Chlorocebus aethiops , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Vero Cells/ultrastructure , Vero Cells/virology , Viral Load , Virus Shedding
2.
J Gen Virol ; 101(9): 925-940, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-610420

ABSTRACT

The sudden emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at the end of 2019 from the Chinese province of Hubei and its subsequent pandemic spread highlight the importance of understanding the full molecular details of coronavirus infection and pathogenesis. Here, we compared a variety of replication features of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV and analysed the cytopathology caused by the two closely related viruses in the commonly used Vero E6 cell line. Compared to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 generated higher levels of intracellular viral RNA, but strikingly about 50-fold less infectious viral progeny was recovered from the culture medium. Immunofluorescence microscopy of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells established extensive cross-reactivity of antisera previously raised against a variety of non-structural proteins, membrane and nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV. Electron microscopy revealed that the ultrastructural changes induced by the two SARS viruses are very similar and occur within comparable time frames after infection. Furthermore, we determined that the sensitivity of the two viruses to three established inhibitors of coronavirus replication (remdesivir, alisporivir and chloroquine) is very similar, but that SARS-CoV-2 infection was substantially more sensitive to pre-treatment of cells with pegylated interferon alpha. An important difference between the two viruses is the fact that - upon passaging in Vero E6 cells - SARS-CoV-2 apparently is under strong selection pressure to acquire adaptive mutations in its spike protein gene. These mutations change or delete a putative furin-like cleavage site in the region connecting the S1 and S2 domains and result in a very prominent phenotypic change in plaque assays.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/physiology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/physiology , Virus Replication/physiology , Adaptation, Biological , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Cell Line/ultrastructure , Cell Line/virology , Chlorocebus aethiops , Computational Biology , Conserved Sequence , Cross Reactions , Cytopathogenic Effect, Viral , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Immune Sera/immunology , Kinetics , Mice , Microscopy, Electron , Microscopy, Fluorescence , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Rabbits , SARS-CoV-2 , Vero Cells/ultrastructure , Vero Cells/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL